dual client fix

[hjvg]

there is a lot of talking about dual client fixes and because of that a lot of classes are being changed. some people see that as inporvement and some dont see it as inprovement.
(i dont want to start the good or wrong thing here)


but if you really want to fix the dual clienting /multiclient make it just that you can run 1 client.
thats in my eyes the real fix for that and then you still can see how you change classes


Edit: after a discusion in discord i have been told 2 clients are alowd because of shops. but the feeling i had in the chat that most are going to dual client and dont use it for a shop as there are other ways to sell items the $ chat or a forum topic

Edited November 27, 2022 by hjvg
discosion in discord

[Critpeak]

Considering that currently there is no offline vending, and you can't really limit clients to a number, because there are several ways to bypass any ip/hardware limitation.

Saying that people wouldn't need to use multiple clients it's a sort of needed reason to say.

 

[hjvg]

1 minute ago, Critpeak said:

Considering that currently there is no offline vending, and you can't really limit clients to a number, because there are several ways to bypass any ip/hardware limitation.

Saying that people wouldn't need to use multiple clients it's a sort of needed reason to say.

 

i edit on the same time you posted

but yea the feeling i get in discord is that the most say we dont really need it for a shop we will use it for dual client as we are used to that

[Critpeak]

Only way to to "fix" this is to limit clients that can be used to 1 - but regarding to current class changes and how this game have worked for so long time. I don't see any of those things as a fix.

[lazypenguin]

We wanted to limit it to 1 client but after talking with players we conceded that two would be better for the time being, main reasons:

- Without offline vending, you can't play and open your shop at the same time
- Players who like to make an Artisan as a second job like to be able to do artisan stuff while still being available on their main account (e.g. queue for dungeon, game arena, etc.)
- With the current storage system, even with max expansion coupons, players who collect a lot of items literally run out of places to store their items

These are some of the things we would like to address before considering a 1 client limit. I'm sure there are other reasons but these were the ones that popped into my head.

[hjvg]

8 hours ago, lazypenguin said:

We wanted to limit it to 1 client but after talking with players we conceded that two would be better for the time being, main reasons:

- Without offline vending, you can't play and open your shop at the same time
- Players who like to make an Artisan as a second job like to be able to do artisan stuff while still being available on their main account (e.g. queue for dungeon, game arena, etc.)
- With the current storage system, even with max expansion coupons, players who collect a lot of items literally run out of places to store their items

These are some of the things we would like to address before considering a 1 client limit. I'm sure there are other reasons but these were the ones that popped into my head.

- Without offline vending, you can't play and open your shop at the same time
True but when your afk you can stell setup your shop and there are more ways to sell items like a forum topic, the $ chat ingame.  at the biggining of rose people where also not running multiple clients for shops

i think most people will use the second client not for the shops but to let a other char leech while lvling. (this was also a bit the outcome of the talk in discord most people sayed yes i will go dual client instead of putting a shop up)

and i think letting chars leeching while lvling was 1 of your biggest reasons to change classes. as you did not want that anymore

Edited November 28, 2022 by hjvg

[Artemis]

Let us just play and see what it gives! It's still Early Access. 
However I feel like this improvement on classes will be a huge succes.